矿灾管理系统中DADV与AODV协议的仿真对比  

Simulation Comparison Between AODV and DSDV Protocols in Mine Disaster Management System

作　　者：陈珊珊[1] 姚善化[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学电气与信息工程学院,安徽淮南232001

出　　处：《煤矿安全》2013年第5期120-122,共3页Safety in Coal Mines

基　　金：安徽高校省级自然科学研究重点资助项目(KJ2011A077);淮南市科技计划资助项目(2011A07917)

摘　　要：移动自组网以其随机和快速更改的拓扑的特点应用于井下通信中,为使网络成功建立需要寻找一个适当和有效的协议以适应采矿特殊环境,利用NS-2模拟器创建接入点和矿工(移动的节点)处的挖掘场景,根据2个重要衡量标准参数分组投递率(PDF)及端到端延迟在不同条件下的仿真结果对比,DSDV协议比AODV协议更适合应用于移动自组网的井下通信系统中。Mobile Ad - hoc network with its random and topological characteristics of rapid changes can apply to underground communications. To establish the network successfully, an appropriate and effective protocol need to be found to accommodate the special environment of mining. Using NS - 2 simulator to create access point and miners （ move nodes ） mining scenario, according to two important measure standard parameters Packets Delivery Fraction （ PDF ） and end to end delay in different conditions simulation results contrast, DSDV protocol is more appropriate to apply in Mobile Ad hoc network of coal mine AODV protocol.

关 键 词：移动自组网 DADV AODV GAF算法 矿灾管理系统 井下通信 

分 类 号：TD655[矿业工程—矿山机电]