检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李美萍[1] 唐良春[2] 邱映明[1] 吴军勇[2]
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市龙岗区人民医院呼吸内科,518172 [2]广东医学院附属医院呼吸内科
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2013年第15期23-25,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的观察集束化护理对于支气管哮喘患者的护理效果。方法选择100例临床确诊为支气管哮喘急性发作期患者,随机分为集束化护理组及对照组各50例。对照组采取常规传统护理措施;集束化护理组采取集束化综合护理方案。观察比较2组患者临床疗效、掌握正确的雾化吸入技巧情况、雾化吸人依从性以及患者对护理工作满意度。结果集束化护理组临床疗效相对较好,总显效率86%,高于对照组的58%;集束化护理组掌握正确的雾化吸入技巧率92%,高于对照组的72%;雾化吸入依从性良好率90%,高于对照组的80%;对护理工作满意度98%,高于对照组的86%。结论运用循证医学方法总结整理的集束化护理对于支气管哮喘患者有较好的护理效果。Objective To observe the nursing efficacy of cluster-based care fobronchial asthma. Method100 casewith bronchial asthmwere randomly divided into the study group and the control group with 50 patientin each group. The control group received usual care, and the study group re- ceived cluster-based care model. Curative effect, the total of the casereceived inhalation therapy cor- rectly, compliance of inhalation therapy, degree of satisfaction to nursing servicein the two groupwere compared. ResultThe curative effecin the study group were bettesignificantly than the control group (86% v58%). The casereceived inhalation therapy correctly in the study group were more than the con- trol group (92% v72%). The compliance of inhalation therapy in the study group wasignificantly highethan the control group(90% v80%). The degree of satisfaction to nursing servicein the study group were significantly highethan the control group (98% v86%). ConclusionCluster-based care had good effecon patientwith bronchial asthma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15