卷宗移送主义:对理想的妥协还是对现实的尊重——2012年刑事诉讼法确立卷宗移送的正当性  

Doctrine of Deportation of Files: Compromise of Ideal of Respect of Reality?: The Justification of Deportation Files in China's Criminal Procedural Law

作　　者：胡莲芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第3期84-89,共6页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：最高人民检察院基金项目(GJ2012C04)

摘　　要："卷宗移送主义""复印件主义""起诉书一本主义"各有利弊,我国2012年刑事诉讼法修订重新选择"卷宗移送主义",这不是历史的倒退。三种卷宗移送方式是并列关系,而非递进关系,法官庭前阅卷与法官预断并无必然关联。当下的中国,选择"卷宗移送主义"不是对理想的妥协,而是对现实和法律文化传统的尊重,具有理论上和实践上的正当性。There are both pros and cons of Doctrines of Deportation of Files, Photocopyism and Indictment - only Doctrine. The 2012 Amendment of Criminal Procedural Law once again in favour of the Doctrine of Deportation of Files cannot be regarded as the retrogression of history. The above - mentioned three approaches of deliver of dossi- er shall be considered as parallel instead of progressive, and reading files before trial will not definitely lead to judge＇ s prejudice. Considering China＇ s reality, the choice of Doctrine of Deportation of Files is justified both theo- retically and practically, which is respect to reality and legal and cultural tradition, rather than compromise of ide- al.

关 键 词：卷宗移送 起诉书一本主义 法官预断 诉讼模式 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]