检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:滕宏庆[1]
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第3期90-95,共6页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:教育部青年基金项目(09YJC820035);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2fxD2117800)
摘 要:尽管我国地方性规定游离于国家法制之外,但在现实中它却是律师角色实现职业价值的某种基础保证。虽然我国2008年新律师法着力于完善律师执业权利,但是在2013年新刑事诉讼法实施之前各地方制度博弈下的迥异做法却加剧震荡了律师执业环境,尤其是会见权利、阅卷权利、调查取证权利和人身保障权利。这一特殊阶段暴露出我国律师执业权利地方性规定的契合与冲突、增量与变量等复杂问题,这必将成为我国中央和地方切实统一保障律师执业权利未来立法及实践的重要考量。Although local rules are eomplementation of career virtue. beyond state legislation, in practice it is a fundamental guarantee for lawyers' Although the new Lawyers Act focuses on promoting lawyers' professional rights in 2008, all locals different wrongdoings speed up threatening the lawyers' professional environment before the new Criminal Procedure Act comes into being in 2013, such as right of meeting, fight of reading case record, right of investigation and evidence collection, right of the person. So throughout this analysis contradictions, developments and varieties of Chinese lawyers' shoud be made to provide the comparative reflection for further state to the local levels in the near future. professional rights in guaranteeing lawyers' on local rules consistency, this special period, efforts professional rights from the
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63