检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾跃红[1] 田海清[1] 郭利民[1] 李伟[1]
出 处:《药物流行病学杂志》2013年第5期225-227,共3页Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
摘 要:目的:比较哌拉西林/舒巴坦与美洛西林/舒巴坦治疗急性细菌性中重度泌尿系统感染的临床疗效,评价其有效性和安全性。方法:76例急性细菌性中重度泌尿系统感染患者随机分为试验组和对照组各38例,分别给予哌拉西林/舒巴坦2.5 g或美洛西林/舒巴坦2.5 g,溶于0.9%氯化钠注射液250 ml,ivd,q8h或q12h,1个疗程为7 d。连续治疗2个疗程后对两组临床疗效、细菌学疗效、药品不良反应等进行综合评价。结果:试验组和对照组痊愈率分别为57.9%和47.4%,总有效率分别为84.2%和78.9%。两组细菌清除率分别为89.2%和82.5%,治疗后细菌转阴率分别为89.5%和86.9%;不良反应发生率均为2.63%。两组各项评价指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:哌拉西林/舒巴坦对于治疗急性细菌性中重度泌尿系统感染安全有效。Objective:To evaluate of the clinical effect and safety of PIP/SBT and MEZ/SBT in the treatment of moderate and severe acute bacterial infection of the urinary system tract.Methods:76 urinary tract infection patients were randomly divided into trial drug group(PIP/SBT) and controlled drug group(MEZ/SBT) with 38 cases each,7 days for a course of treatment.After 2 courses of treatment,their clinical bacteriological efficacy and adverse events were evaluated. Results:The cure rates of the trial drug group and controlled drug group were 57.9%and 47.4%,and the total effective rates were 84.2%and 78.9%.Their bacterial clearance rates were 89.2%and 82.5%,the negative rates of bacteria after treatment were 89.5%and 86.9%,and the adverse effects rate of the two groups was 2.63%.There was no significant difference in each evaluation index(P 0.05).Conclusion:PIP/SBT had their good clinical effect and safety in the treatment of the moderate and severe acute bacterial urinary system tract infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.64.23