检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学马克思主义学院,重庆401120 [2]西南政法大学心理健康教育中心,重庆401120 [3]西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第2期180-184,187,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部2012年一般人文社科青年基金(12YJC880070)"高特质愤怒大学生注意偏向的激活抑制及注意偏向训练研究"的资助
摘 要:目的:探讨高特质愤怒个体对负性情绪刺激注意偏向的潜在机制。方法:采用同中选异实验范式,以高、低特质愤怒大学生各24名为被试,对比分析高、低特质愤怒被试在中性干扰刺激中搜索情绪靶刺激(注意敏感)及在情绪干扰刺激中搜索中性靶刺激(注意锁定)反应时的差异。结果:重复测量方差分析发现,注意敏感实验中,以11、19张中性面孔为干扰刺激时,皆存在靶刺激主效应及靶刺激与组别交互效应,进一步分析发现,高特质愤怒被试对愤怒面孔为靶刺激的反应时皆显著短于以快乐面孔为靶刺激的反应时。注意锁定实验中,以11、19张情绪面孔为干扰刺激时,皆存在干扰刺激主效应及干扰刺激与组别的交互效应,进一步分析发现,11张情绪面孔为干扰刺激时,高特质愤怒被试以愤怒面孔为干扰刺激的反应时显著长于以快乐面孔为干扰刺激的反应时,以19张情绪面孔为干扰刺激时,两组被试以愤怒面孔为干扰刺激的反应时皆显著长于以快乐面孔为干扰刺激的反应时。结论:高特质愤怒者对威胁性刺激的警觉——锁定是其对威胁性刺激产生注意偏向的潜在原因。Objective: To investigate potential mechanism of high trait anger individuals' attentional bias to negative emotional stimulus.Methods: 24 high trait anger college students and 24 low ones were selected as subjects.Odd-one-out search task was selected to compare the differences of reaction time of the two groups while searching emotional stimulus in neutral distracters and searching neutral target stimulus in emotional distracters.Results: It was shown by Repeated Measurement ANOVA that main effect(F=37.701,P=0.000) in target stimulus and interaction effect between groups and target stimulus were found in attentional sensitivity trials while 11 neutral facial expressions were used as distracters.Further analysis showed the reaction time of high trait anger subjects to angry facial expression target was shorter than to happy facial expression target.Main effect(F=95.553,P=0.000) in target stimulus and interaction effect between groups and target stimulus were also found in attentional sensitivity trials while 19 neutral facial expressions were used as distracters.Further analysis showed the reaction time of high trait anger subjects to angry facial expression target was shorter than to happy facial expression target in distracters stimuli and interaction effect between groups and distracters stimuli were found in attentional fixation trials while 11 emotional facial expressions were used as distracters.Further analysis showed the reaction time of high trait anger subjects while angry facial expression distracters was longer than while happy facial expression distracters.Main effect(F=26.781,P=0.000) in distracters stimuli and interaction effect between groups and distracters stimuli were found in attentional fixation trials while 19 emotional facial expressions were used as distracters.Further analysis showed the reaction time of high and low trait anger subjects while angry facial expression distracters was longer than while happy facial expression distracters.Conclusion: It is potential cau
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.230.29