检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津市第四医院脑系科,300222
出 处:《中国现代神经疾病杂志》2013年第4期338-341,共4页Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
摘 要:观察并比较压力释放通气(APRV)和压力控制通气(PCV)模式对重型颅脑创伤并发低氧血症患者脑血氧代谢的改善效果。经颅内压、脑血流、氧分压等指标监测显示,11例患者经APRV模式辅助呼吸30min后低氧血症即得到明显改善,而颅内压平均值与PCV模式十分相近(P>0.05);在APRV模式下颈内动脉血流量和动脉血氧分压提高,分别为(528.82±65.27)ml/min和(132.49±20.30)mmHg,PCV模式为(430.27±33.44)ml/min和(79.38±10.22) mm Hg,两种通气模式对脑氧代谢改善效果差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。提示APRV模式可在不增加颅内压的情况下,更好地改善氧供和低氧血症。The article aims to observe and compare the efficiency of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) on patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) complicated with hypoxemia. The monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) showed 11 patients with hypoxemia had been significantly improved by 30 minutes of APRV. The ICP in APRV was similar with that in PCV (P 〉 0.05). CBF and PaO2 under APRV mode were (528.82± 65.27) ml/min and (132.49± 20.30) mm Hg respectively, and (430.27 ± 33.44) ml/min and (79.38± 10.22) mm Hg respectively under PCV mode. The differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05, for all). Therefore, APRV could be effective in improving oxygen supply and hypoxemia without increasing ICP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229