检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王圆[1]
机构地区:[1]海口市疾病预防控制中心,海南海口571100
出 处:《现代预防医学》2013年第11期2138-2140,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的了解海口市常规免疫接种率监测情况,同时评价报告接种率的可信性。方法对2001~2010年常规免疫报告接种率监测结果,采用差值(D值)、比值(R值)和调查接种率的比较法进行分析。结果 2001~2010年"五苗"(乙肝疫苗、卡介苗、脊髓灰质炎、百白破、麻类)报告接种率为94.40%-99.79%,D值和R值综合评价"可信""可疑"各占50%;与调查接种率的比较:76%的差异无统计学意义。结论 10年来海口市报告接种率均维持在较高的水平,可信性尚可。实施预防接种信息化管理有利于提高报告接种率可信性。OBJECTIVE To understand the status of surveillance of routine immunization coverage rates in Haikou City,and evaluate the credibility of the reported coverage rates of routine immunization. METHODS The surveillance data of routine immunization coverage rates reported from 2001 to 2010 were statistically analyzed using the evaluation method of difference(D),ratio(R)and were compared with the investigated coverage rates. RESULTS The reported coverage rates of routine immunization of "5 vaccines"(HBV,BCG,PV,DPT,MCV)were from 94.40% to 99.79% from 2001 to 2010.With synthesized estimations of D value and R value,the data were half credible,and half suspicious(50%). The data of the reported coverage rates and the investigated coverage rates were compared:76% differences were not significantly different. CONCLUSION The reported coverage rates of routine immunization maintain a high level during the past 10 years,and credibility is passable.Implement information management of vaccination can enhance the reliability of the reported coverage rates of routine immunization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15