检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学人文社会科学学院,太原030001
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2013年第5期551-553,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:山西省软科学基金项目(051043-3)
摘 要:目的探讨中学生应对方式与攻击性的关系,为指导学校教育工作者识别和干预中学生的健康危险行为提供依据。方法运用中学生应对方式量表和青少年攻击性问卷,对随机抽取的太原市900名中学生进行施测,对应对方式和攻击性各因子进行描述统计、相关分析和逐步回归分析。结果中学生应对方式量表各因子与攻击性总分及各因子之间存在一定程度的相关(r值分别为-0.067~0.321,P值均<0.01);回归分析表明,应对方式中发泄情绪、问题解决、幻想否认、寻求社会支持因子对攻击性总分的回归效应达到统计学意义(β值分别为2.519,-1.369,1.026,-0.568,P值均<0.01)。结论中学生应对方式与攻击性有密切联系,应有针对性地加强干预和指导工作。Objective To investigate the coping styles of middle school students and the relationship with aggressive, and to provide evidence for guiding the educators to recognize and intervene the students health-related risk behavior. Methods By using the scale of coping styles for middle school students and the adolescent aggressiveness questionnaire, 900 middle school students were tested. The methods of descriptive analysis, correlation analysis and stcpwise regression analysis were used to analyze the coping style and aggressive factors. Results The factors of coping style scale and were correlated to the total score of aggres- sion scores and the score of each factor ( r=0.066-0. 321, P〈0.01 ). Regression analysis indicated that coping style factor such as emotional, problem solving, illusionldeny, seeking for social support, had significant effects on offensive score (β = 1. 369-2.519, P 〈0.01 ) , which was a predictive indicator of aggression.. Conclusion The middle school students coping style is closely correlated to aggressive behavior.
分 类 号:R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学] B844.2[医药卫生—医学心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.159