检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭艳崇[1]
机构地区:[1]澳门理工学院社会经济与公共政策研究所,澳门999078
出 处:《妇女研究论丛》2013年第3期34-40,共7页Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
摘 要:夫妻财产权的平等保护是婚姻法中的一项重要原则。婚姻法司法解释按照财产权的规则对夫妻财产和个人财产进行界分,实行平均分割和同等保护,以指导和解决司法适用中出现的新问题。然而,从社会性别的视角看,司法解释的这一中立立场,同样忽略了女性在家庭和社会现实生活中的不利处境和地位,并不能有效保护处于弱势的女性财产权益。因此,司法实践中不能孤立简单地适用司法解释,而要回归到婚姻法确立的相关原则中,在夫妻财产权的司法保护上走向实质平等和公正。The equal protection of the property fights of the husband and the wife is a main principle in marriage law. According to the principle of property rights, the judicial interpretations of the Marriage Law distinguish the property shared by the husband and the wife from personal property rights, giving equal division and protection to the former, in order to guide the resolution of emerging issues in the application of the Law. However, from a gender perspective, this paper argues that the above judicial interpretations, which appear to hold a gender-neutral standing, have actually overlooked women's disadvantaged position in the family and society, one that has pre- vented women from protecting their property rights effectively. Therefore, the judges should not rule simply based on the above judicial interpretations. They should observe the relative principles and regulations of the Marriage Law, and uphold justice and equity to pro- vide the needed protection to women in actual judicial deliveries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62