检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢伟伟[1] 李振宇[1] 闫志凌[1] 刘凯歌[1] 李宁[1] 曹江[1] 潘秀英[1] 何徐彭[1] 徐开林[1]
出 处:《中华血液学杂志》2013年第5期409-412,共4页Chinese Journal of Hematology
摘 要:目的比较两种糖皮质激素联合小剂量利妥昔单方案治疗成人原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的疗效。方法74例ITP患者,男35例、女39例,中位年龄34(18—70)岁,新诊断的ITP60例、持续性ITP6例、慢性ITP5例、难治性ITP3例。按糖皮质激素治疗方案随机分为①对照组(36例):地塞米松40mg/d第1-4天口服;利妥昔单抗100mg第7、14、21、28天静脉滴注。②试验组(38例):地塞米松40mg/d第1—4天口服;泼尼松60mg/d第5~7天、30mg/d第8~14天、20mg/d第15~21天、10mg/d第22~28天1:3服;利妥昔单抗100mg第7、14、21、28天静脉滴注。观察比较两组患者的近、远期疗效和不良反应情况。结果治疗第4天,对照组、试验组患者PTJT分别由治疗前的11(1~26)X109/L、10(2~20)X109/L升高至84(23—132)X10。/L、80(22—115)X109/L;治疗第14天,试验组患者PⅡ明显高于对照组[163(19~262)X109儿对98(18~238)X109/L,P=0.045];治疗第28天,试验组患者总有效率高于对照组(84.21%对66.67%,P=0.03);随访至6、12个月,对照组和试验组患者持续有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(63.89%对65.79%,58.33%对60.53%,P〉0.05)。两组患者不良反应均能耐受。结论大剂量地塞米松后泼尼松维持联合小剂量利妥昔单抗方案治疗ITP早期缓解率优于地塞米松联合小剂量利妥昔单抗方案。Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab combined with different dosage of glucocorticoids for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods Seventy-four patients (35 male, median age 34 years, range 18 - 70 years) including 60 newly-diagnosed, 6 persistent, 5 chronic and 3 refractory patients were enrolled in this study, and separated into control (36 cases) and experimental (38 cases) groups according to the dosage of glucoeorticoids. Patients in both groups received dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1 -4, followed by rituximab 100 mg on days 7, 14, 21, 28. The patients in experimental group also received decrements of prednisone 60, 30, 20, 10 mg/day on days 5 -7, 8 - 14, 15 -21, 22 - 28. The initial, long-term efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results Platelet counts of all patients at day 4 remarkably increased,with the median platelet count from 11 (1 -26 ) x 109/L to 84 (23 - 132 ) x 109/L in control group, and 10(2 -20) x 109/L to 80 (22 - 115 ) x 109/L in experimental group;the platelet counts of patients at day 14 in experimental group [ 163( 19 -262) x 109/LI was higher than that of control group [98 (18 - 238) x 109/L] (P 〈 0. 05). The overall response (OR) rates at day 28 in experimental group ( 84.21% ) was significantly higher than that of control group ( 66.67% ,P = 0.03 ). There was no significant difference of sustained response (SR) rates in two groups(63.89% vs 65.79% , 58.33% vs 60.53% ,P 〉 0.05 ) at six and twelve months follow-up points. Both groups showed similar incidence of adverse events, and no patients discontinued the treatment due to side effects. Conclusion Low-dose rituximab and glucocortieoids was an effective method for ITP patients, and maintenance treatment with decrements of prednisone contributed to improving earlier CR rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222