检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省青岛市第三人民医院,山东青岛266041
出 处:《河北医学》2000年第8期697-699,共3页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的 :比较普瑞博思和雷尼替丁治疗胃源性哮喘的疗效。方法 :将 4 2名经胃食道钡剂造影确诊的胃源性哮喘患儿分成两组 ,分别以普瑞博思和雷尼替丁口服 8周 ,然后通过胃食道钡剂造影、最大呼气峰流速和临床总体疗效来进行判断。结果 :普瑞博思优于雷尼替丁 ,在上述三个方面均有显著差异 ( P<0 .0 1、P<0 .0 1、P<0 .0 5)。结论Objective:Comparing prepulsid with renitidini on the curative effective of treating asthma arising from stomach.Methods:Divided the children diagnosed as asthma arising from stomach by gastroesopnageal barium meal radiography into two groups,and asked them to take prepulosid or renitidini separately in 8 weeks,and then studied it throug gastroesopnageal barium meal radiography,peak of expiratory flow rate,and clinical total curative effective.Results:Prepulsid is better than renitidini in the three aspects(P<0.01,P<0.01,P<0.05).Conclusion:Prepulsid has better curative effective than renitidini on treating asthma arising from stomach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145