检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国校医》2013年第5期376-377,共2页Chinese Journal of School Doctor
摘 要:目的对晚期肿瘤胸水患者采用胸腔置管引净积液后灌注化疗药物或生物制剂,并观察其疗效及不良反应。方法随机将恶性胸水患者分成两组,分别采用置管引流及胸腔穿刺抽水后灌注药物。结果治疗组15例,有效率80%,对照组15例,有效率53.3%(P<0.05);患者机能状况KPS评分改善治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论导管型抽液器行置管引流术加局部药物灌注治疗效果明显优于传统穿刺术且安全性高。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of infusing chemotherapeutic drugs or biological agents into the pleural cavity of the patients with advanced tumors by means of pleural cavity drainage. Methods The patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomly divided into two groups. The pleural cavity drainage and thoracentesis were operated respectively. Results The response rate of 15 cases of the treatment group was 80 %, whereas the response rate of the 15 cases of the control group was 53.3 % ( P 〈 0.05). The improvement of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) in the treatment group was more than that in the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The effect of infusing drugs into the pleural cavity by means of pleural cavity drainage is superior to thoracentesis and the operation of pleura[ cavity drainage is safer than thoracentesis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145