论基本权利的宪法救济与违宪审查——以印度宪法相关制度为视角  

Constitutional Relief to Fundamental Rights and the Judicial Review——With the focus on the systems concerned in India's Constitution

作　　者：周小明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海201620 [2]丽水广播电视大学,浙江丽水323000

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期115-120,共6页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：浙江省丽水市社会科学界联合会2012年立项课题(LC201209)

摘　　要：仅仅给予基本权利以立法救济是远远不够的,印度宪法第32条的基本权利救济制度及相关违宪审查制度值得我国学习。我国的宪法监督制度建设应先易后难,可以分为6个步骤。第一步和第二步是当未被具体化为法律权利的基本权利受到侵犯时,普通法院给予直接救济;第三步至第六步是使普通司法机关和独立的宪法法院分享一定的违宪审查权。我国的宪法监督模式应该是美国普通法院司法审查模式与德国宪法法院模式的结合。It is not enough to relive fundamental rights only through legislation, l he right renet system In Article 32 of India＇s Constitution and the judicial system concerned are well worth exploring. The con- struction of China＇s constitutional supervision system should be carried out from the easy to the complex in six steps. In the first and the second steps, the local courts can give direct relief when fundamental rights which have not been specified as legal rights are infringed. The third step to the sixth step are to authorize the judicial organs and independent constitutional courts the power to review the unconstitutionality of laws. China＇s constitutional supervision mode should be a combination of the United States mode of judi- cial review by local courts with the Germany mode of constitutional court.

关 键 词：基本权利 宪法救济 违宪审查 印度宪法 

分 类 号：D935.1[政治法律—法学] D921