检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长茂[1]
出 处:《中外医疗》2013年第12期33-34,共2页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探讨新型颅内支架Solitaire辅助弹簧圈拴塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤的临床价值。方法选取2012年5月—2013年4月该院收治的颅内动脉瘤患者37例为治疗组,采用Solitaire支架辅助弹簧圈拴塞术治疗,另选之前采用传统开颅动脉瘤夹闭术治疗的30例颅内动脉瘤患者为对照组。对比两组手术前后的影像学评价和出院时的格拉斯哥(GCS)评分。结果两组手术均获成功。①按Paymond标准,治疗组术后完全栓塞率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);瘤颈残留率、不完全栓塞率低于对照组(P<0.05)。②治疗组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05);GCS评分平均(5.12±1.03)分显著高于对照组GCS评分平均(3.84±1.17)分(P<0.05)。结论 Solitaire支架辅助弹簧圈拴塞术是治疗宽颈或相对宽颈颅内动脉瘤的安全有效方案,优于传统开颅动脉瘤夹闭术治疗。Objective Investigate the clinical value of new intracranial stent Solitaire assisted coil embolization in treatment of intracranial aneurysm. Methods Select our hospital 37 patients from May 2012 to April 2013 with intracranial aneurysms as the treatment group, treating with Solitaire stent-assisted coil embolization.Another select the traditional craniotomy aneurysm clipping treatment of 30 cases as control group.Contrast imaging evaluation in two groups before and after surgery and discharge Glasgow (GCS) score. Results Two groups of operation had been successful.1)According to the standard of Paymond,treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group with complete occlusion rate(P0.05);The rate of residual aneurysm neck, incomplete embolization was lower than the control group(P0.05).2)Incidence of postoperative complications of treatment group was significantly lower than the control group(P0.05);GCS score points average(5.12±1.03)was significantly higher than that the control group was(3.84±1.17)(P0.05).Conclusion Solitaire stent-assisted coil embolization is a safe and effective regimen for the treatment of wide-necked or relative wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, is superior to the traditional craniotomy and aneurysm clipping treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15