检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学土木工程系,北京100086 [2]南京丰盛新能源科技股份有限公司,南京210012
出 处:《土木建筑与环境工程》2013年第3期151-156,共6页Journal of Civil,Architectural & Environment Engineering
基 金:清华-MIT-剑桥三校低碳大学联盟基金(300907001)
摘 要:相对于钻孔埋管换热器,桩基埋管换热器在换热性能和经济性方面均具有较大优势,目前越来越广泛的应用于地源热泵工程中。围绕钻孔与桩基埋管换热器的结构特点和换热机理进行对比分析,针对南京某项目桩基埋管换热器开展了换热性能实测及数值模拟分析,并采用数值模拟手段对比分析了钻孔与桩基埋管换热器的换热性能差异。研究结果进一步证明了桩基埋管换热器具有良好的换热性能。提出的传热性能数值模拟方法可较准确地计算出桩基和钻孔埋管换热器的传热效率。Due to their enhanced cost-effectiveness and efficiency over traditional borehole exchangers, energy piles are increasingly used in Ground Sourced Heat Pump (GSHP) projects. In this paper, the structural characteristics of these two types of heat exchangers and their heat transfer mechanism were discussed firstly. The thermal response tests (TRT) were performed on two testing energy piles in one GSHP project in Nanjing, China. The TRT results were then used to verify the numerical simulations, which suggests that the heat exchange performance of energy piles is superior to that of the traditional borehole exchangers. Meanwhile, the numerical simulation method used in this paper was considered applicable to the optimization design of ground heat exchangers in GSHP svstem
分 类 号:TU831.7[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28