国际商事仲裁的审理方式  

Methods of Try in the International Commercial Arbitration

作　　者：杨玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期51-58,共8页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD081);上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目资助(国际法学)(J51103)

摘　　要：国际商事仲裁的审理方式与国际民事诉讼具有完全不同的实践品格,前者强调"适当",后者重在"依法"。国际商事仲裁广泛采用不公开审理是基于仲裁保密和仲裁友好的考虑,但不公开审理具有相对性,有当事人协议和法律强制性规定之例外。相比较国内仲裁,国际商事仲裁书面审理或开庭审理之方式选择意义重大。实践中采用何种方式,则为当事人意愿、案件自身特点、程序自然公正以及程序效率等各因素的平衡。国际商事仲裁程序询问制抑或抗辩制之追问受到仲裁程序诉讼化的影响,实践中影响审理模式的因素有仲裁程序准据法、仲裁规则、仲裁员的身份以及当事人律师的习惯。考察国际商事仲裁的具体实践,询问制和抗辩制在国际商事仲裁中有相互融合之趋势,难分伯仲。The methods of try in the international commercial arbitration have different practices from international civil procedure, with the former putting emphasis on ＂appropriate＂ and the latter on ＂conformity with law＂. Based on the consideration of arbitration confidentiality and amiable arbitration, trial in camera is widely used in international civil pro- cedure, which is confined by litigants and mandatory provisions of the law. Compared with domestic arbitration, the choice of hearings or written trials is of great significance, and is determined by various factors, such as litigants＇ willing, the features of the case, natural justice and procedure efficiency. The inquisitorial system or the adversary system in the inter- national commercial arbitration is influenced by arbitration litigation, and factors ＂,affecting the trial patterns include applica- ble laws in arbitration, arbitration rules, the positions of arbitrators and the habits of litigants＇ lawyers.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 不公开审理 书面审理 询问制 抗辩制 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]