行政争议的调解解决:理论争鸣及视阈转向  

On the Conciliation of Administrative Disputes:Theoretical Divergence and Optic Angel Transfer

作　　者：丁玉海[1] 于丽霞[2] 

机构地区：[1]大连行政学院,辽宁大连116000 [2]吉林大学,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《行政与法》2013年第4期82-86,共5页Administration and Law

摘　　要：目前,我国的行政争议数量激增且类型多元,而其解决渠道则运行不畅且效果欠佳,无法满足社会解决行政争议的现实需求。由此,行政争议的调解解决日渐得到重视,因其存在的理论桎梏导致理论界和实务界对其存在着较大的分歧。因此,有必要对行政争议调解解决的理论争鸣进行梳理,并应根据形势发展之需适时对固有的研究视阈进行转向,将其研究视阈从理论供给转移到实践需求、从法律原则转移到解纷方式上来,为行政争议的调解解决寻求相应的现实基础和理论支持。It is that administrative disputes in China soar and show diversity at present,which the settlement channels of traditional administrative dispute are too are not sequent in operation and too had in effect to unable to meet actual needs upon the society for solving administrative cosputes. Hercon,it attaches importance to gradually the conciliation of administrative disputes but it causes major divergence between academic circle and practical circle for its theoretical shackles.Thercfore,it presents that the settlement of conciliation of administrative disputes,on the basis of clear-up of theoretical divergence of conciliation of administrative disputes and in accordance with situation change,shall transfer intrinsic research angle of view in time that from the theory supply to the practical need and the law rule to the dispute disposal pattern in order to seek for corresponding actual basis and theoretical support for the conciliation of administrative disputes.

关 键 词：行政争议 调解 实践需求 解纷方式 

分 类 号：D922.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]