参与性农村评估与定量调查方法比较之我见  

The Difference Between Participatory Rural Appraisal and Quantitative Survey

作　　者：何月英[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西省妇幼保健院,太原030013

出　　处：《中国初级卫生保健》2000年第9期36-37,共2页Chinese Primary Health Care

摘　　要：根据福特基金会资助的“改善农村生育卫生服务”项目县青海省互助县、贵州省大方县、河南省嵩县、山西省榆社县PRA调查和问卷调查结果,对两种调查方法进行比较。结果显示:PRA定性调查与定量调查相比,能对专题进行深入调查;群众参与广泛、主动性强、趣味性好;方法直观、易掌握;适于了解人们的看法,深入追究问题的原因;省时、省力、省经费。但调查局限;资料不便统计分析;样本小,难推断总体。定量调查样本量大,适于定量资料调查;所获信息便于统计学处理分析,能较好推断总体,如果质量保证,可以得到全局准确的数量信息,但是调查费时、费力、费财;群众参与性、主动性差。Based on data of 4 counties about PRA and questionnaire survey, this paper discusses advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. The final conclusion is that questionnaire survey is time wasting, strenuously and costly and people' participation is inadequate while PRA is time saving, labor saving, economical,In research for reproductive health service, two methods should be use jointly.

关 键 词：参与性农村评估 PRA 生育卫生 

分 类 号：R169[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]