《文艺月报》印数“二十多万份”之谜——从巴金对1955年7月号《文艺月报》印数之说与实际出入说起  

The Mystery of Over Two Hundred Thousand Copies of The Art Monthly——Regarding the Discrepancy between the Actual Printing Copies of the Issue of The Art Monthlyon July 1995 and Bajin's Claimed Quantity

作　　者：董国和 

出　　处：《黎明职业大学学报》2013年第1期1-5,30,共6页Journal of LiMing Vocational University

摘　　要：巴金说1955年7月号《文艺月报》印数"二十多万份",这与实际十五万份的印数有出入,巴金对《文艺月报》印数"二十多万份"的说法从何说起,这说法是否有背景和来历,这是个待解之谜。事实表明,1955年7月号《文艺月报》的印数突变与张春桥有着极大关联。解释《文艺月报》1955年7月号印数之谜,及由此将相关事件一连串揭开,可助于对巴金结怨于张春桥的事实清楚地了解;而只有清楚了他们结怨的原因,对巴金向张春桥、姚文元"亮剑"的来龙去脉和他"文革"中的遭遇等问题,也就不会感到是无根之木、无源之水。Bajin claimed that there were over 200,000 copies of The Art Monthly published on July 1995, while actually the number was different from 150,000 copies printed. The origin of Bajin＇ s claim remains an argument. As many facts show, Zhang Chunqiao was closely related to such dramatic change of the printing quantity. Explanation for the changed printing quantity of The Art Monthly on July 1955 and revelation of the related incidents will contribute to readers＇ understanding of the enmity between Bajin and Zhang Chunqiao. And only by understanding of the enmity between Bajin and Zhang Chunqiao, as a result, readers can under- stand the cause and effect of Bajin＇ s accusation against Zhang Chunqiao and Yao Wenyuan and Bajin＇ s con- sequent suffering in The Cultural Revolution.

关 键 词：巴金 《文艺月报》 印数 张春桥 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]