土地制度变迁与农村经济增长——理论逻辑与实证评价  

Land Institutional Change and Rural Economic Growth——Theoretical logic and empirical evaluation

作　　者：崔占峰[1] 李宇飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学经济管理学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《科学与管理》2013年第2期64-68,共5页Science and Management

基　　金：山东省软科学研究项目:基于技术进步的土地制度变迁与经济增长关系实证研究(2010RKGB1123);山东省社科规划青年项目:基于刘易斯转折区间假说的农村经济发展方式转变研究(12DJJJ15)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：实证研究是现代经济学常用的方法。计量学派的实证研究通过将"制度"这一变量嫁接到技术、资本或劳动上,形成了制度变迁与经济增长关系实证研究的两种思路。土地制度与农村经济增长之间关系的实证研究是上述思路的具体运用。尽管不同研究者设置的制度维度存在差异,但却得到了制度变迁对增长具有正向作用的一致结论。结论的一致性排除了制度失灵理论上的可能性,却增加了陷入福格尔反事实度量法陷阱的危险。土地制度变迁的动态性增加了比较研究的重要性,而将制度对于经济增长贡献的度量拓展到对更为复杂的经济发展的度量将具有更现实的意义。Empirical research is a commonly used method of modern economics. An empirical study of the measurement school formed two approaches of institutional change and empirical studies of economic growth by grafting the variable ＂Institution＂ on technology, capital or labor. An empirical study of the relationship between the land institution and rural economic growth is a specific application of the above ideas. Although different researchers set different dimensions of the institution,it drew the consistent conclusions that institutional change has a positive effect on growth. The consistency of the conclusions excluded the possibility of Theory Of System Malfunction,but increased the danger of falling into the trap of Fogel Counterfactural Measurment.The dynamic nature of land institutional change increased the importance of comparative studies,and the expansion of institution for the measure of contribution of economic growth to More complex measure of economic development will have more realistic significance

关 键 词：土地制度变迁 农村经济增长 实证评价 

分 类 号：F301.1[经济管理—产业经济]