检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘兰勇[1]
出 处:《当代经济管理》2013年第5期54-60,共7页Contemporary Economic Management
摘 要:在对我国原产地规则和标准进行剖析后,认为我国原产地标准存在过于宽松的缺陷,而这个缺陷使得很多加工贸易产品即使在我国增值百分比很低却能容易地获得我国的原产地证书从而以"中国产品"名义出口,这样就夸大了我国的贸易顺差。只有采用增值百分比标准,才能比较准确地反映我国的真实贸易差额。通过计算加工贸易增值率发现,进料加工增值率超过30%,属于"中国产品",2002年~2012年来料加工增值率低于30%,不属于"中国产品",应当从我国出口中减去。调整后的结果说明目前我国采用的原产地标准确实夸大了我国贸易差额。With further analysis of China's origin rules and criterion,this paper holds that China's origin criterion are too low,which enable many processing trade products even with low value-added percentage to easily get China's certificate of origin and be exported in terms of " Chinese Products",thus exaggerating China's trade surplus.This paper thinks that only adopting value-added percentage standard can the figure accurate ly reflect the China's real trade balance.Through calculating the value-added ratio of processing trade,it is found that only those with more than 30% value-added ratio for processing with imported materials can be deemed as" Chinese Products",thus those lower than 30% during 20022012 should not be considered as " Chinese Products" and should be subtracted from China's export.The adjusted result indicates that the cur rent China's origin criterion does exaggerate China's trade balance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74