检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜淑华[1]
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院刑事司法学院,山东济南250100
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2013年第3期99-103,共5页Journal of Shandong Police College
基 金:山东政法学院校级课题"传统与现代--本土化刑事和解模式的建构"的阶段性成果
摘 要:侦查过程容易侵犯到犯罪嫌疑人的各项基本权利,西方国家都注重通过立法加强对侦查行为的制约与监督。我国刑事诉讼法虽然也涉及到这个问题,但还存在诸多的问题,这就使得对侦查行为的制约力度大打折扣。因此,基于规制侦查行为的合法性和人权保障的需要,必须重塑我国的侦查制约机制。The basic rights of criminal suspects are easily infringed upon in the process of criminal investigation. In western countries, the restriction and supervision of investigation behaviors are strengthened through legislation. Although the criminal procedure law of our country also involves the problem, but there are many problems in it, which weakens the restricted power towards criminal investigation. Therefore, based on the need to regulate legality of criminal investigation and the guarantee of human rights, the restriction mechanism of investigation in our country must be reconstructed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49