检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡成文[1] 黄家丽[1] 叶祺[1] 张鹏年[1] 孙正勤[1] 薛宁宁[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属省立医院护理部,合肥市230001
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2013年第6期521-523,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:安徽高校省级自然科学研究资助项目(编号:KJ2012Z141)
摘 要:目的比较不同护理级别分类方法在住院患者中直接护理时间的差异,探索综合护理分级的可行性。方法通过实时观察某三级甲等医院461例住院患者24h直接护理时间,比较直接护理时间在医嘱护理分级、日常生活活动能力(ADL)护理分级以及综合护理分级之间的差异。结果不同医嘱护理级别、ADL护理分级及综合护理分级患者的直接护理时间的差异有统计学意义。结论以医嘱护理分级作为病情观察需要、ADL护理分级作为患者生活护理需求为依据的综合护理分级,更能满足患者病情和生活护理需求。Objective To compare the difference of direct nursing time for hospitalized patients based on different nursing grading system,and to explore the feasibility of integrated nursing grading system. Methods The direct nursing time among 461 inpatients were recorded and compared among nursing grading system based on physicians' orders,Barthel index and integrated grading. Results There were significant differences in the direct nursing time among different nursing grading systems. Conclusion It is suggested that the integrated nursing grading system based on physicians' orders and activities of daily living can better meet the severity of disease and basic nursing needs of hospitalized patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90