机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院急诊科,上海200233
出 处:《临床荟萃》2013年第6期636-639,共4页Clinical Focus
摘 要:目的探讨老年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的死亡危险因素,为老年CAP患者的临床诊治提供参考依据。方法选取我院2011~2012年急诊收治的老年CAP患者275例为研究对象,采用病例对照研究的方法,分析死亡患者的危险因素。结果死亡组年龄和呼吸频率均高于生存组,长期卧床、误吸、意识障碍、低血压(收缩压<90mmHg或舒张压<60mmHg)、重症肺炎、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、胸腔积液和多叶病变的比例均高于生存组,尿素氮、血肌酐、空腹血糖、CURB-65评分高于生存组,氧合指数和白蛋白低于生存组。分别为年龄(80.3±7.4)岁vs(76.5±6.7)岁、长期卧床21例(25.6%)vs 16例(8.3%)、误吸17例(20.7%)vs 11例(5.7%)、意识障碍17例(20.7%)vs 14例(7.3%)、呼吸频率(28.39±6.87)次/min vs(22.66±5.06)次/min、低血压25例(30.5%)vs 5例(2.6%)、重症肺炎69例(84.1%)vs 85例(44.0%)、糖尿病30例(36.6%)vs 45例(23.3%)、COPD 14例(17.1%)vs 15例(7.8%)、胸腔积液16例(19.5%)vs 13例(6.7%)、多叶病变52例(63.4%)vs 58例(30.1%)、氧合指数296.37±58.10vs 334.71±37.23、尿素氮(10.52±3.36)mmol/L vs(9.21±3.13)mmol/L、血肌酐(90.46±23.21)μmol/L vs(77.74±19.79)μmol/L、白蛋白(31.48±6.02)g/L vs(34.28±3.92)g/L、空腹血糖(9.16±5.40)mmol/L vs(7.14±2.02)mmol/L、CURB-65(2.62±1.01)分vs(1.59±0.75)分(P<0.05或<0.01)。多因素logistic逐步回归表明,有6个因素(年龄、呼吸频率、低血压、血肌酐、空腹血糖、多叶病变)对死亡的影响差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年CAP病死率高,年龄、呼吸频率、低血压、血肌酐、空腹血糖和多叶病变为老年CAP死亡危险因素。Objective To explore risk factors of death in elderly patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods Retrospective review was performed in 275 medical records and administrative data of adults aged 65 years or older hospitalized for CAP in 2011 to 2012. Analysis of risk factors for death in patients with CAP using a case- control study method. Results Age, respiratory rate, the proportion of long-term bedridden, aspiration, disturbance of conseiousness,hypotension (SBPG90 mmHg or DBPG 60 mmHg), severe pneumonia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, multi-lobe lesions, the levels of blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, fasting plasma glucose,CURB-65 score were significantly higher in death group than those of survival group, respectively age (80.3±7.4) years old vs (76.5±6.7) years old,respiratory rate (28. 39±6.87) times/min vs (22.66±5.06) times/ rain,long-term bedridden 21 cases(25.6%) vs 16 eases(8.3%) ,error aspiration 17 eases(20.7%) vs 11 cases(5.7%), disturbance of consciousness 17 eases (20.7%) vs 14 eases(7.3%) ,hypotension 25 eases(30.5%) vs 5 cases(2.6%), severe pneumonia 69 eases (84.1% ) vs 85 eases (44.0 %), diabetes 30 eases (36.6 % ) vs 45 cases (23.3 % ), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 14 cases ( 17.1% ) vs 15 cases (7.8%), pleural effusion 16 cases ( 19.5% ) vs 13 cases (6.7 % ), multi-lobe lesions 52 cases (63.4 %) vs 58 cases (30.1%), blood urea nitrogen ( 10.52± 3.36) mrnol/L vs (9.21+3.13) mmol/L,serum creatinine (90.46±23.21) μmol/L vs (77.74±19.79) μmol/L,fasting plasma glucose (9.16±5.40) mmol/L vs (7.14±2.02) mmol/L,CURB-65 (2.62±1.01) scores vs (1.59±0.75) scores;but oxygen index and albumin level were significantly lower in death group than those of survival group, respectively (296.37±58.10) vs (334.71±37.23) ,(31.48±6.02) g/L vs (34.28±3.92) g/L( P〈0.05 or 〈0.01). Mu
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...