检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:封任冬[1,2] 陆建环[1,2] 李润明[1,2] 邓志春[1,2] 高琨[1,2]
机构地区:[1]玉溪市人民医院 [2]昆明医科大学第六附属医院,云南玉溪653100
出 处:《中国医学影像学杂志》2013年第5期341-343,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基 金:云南省省院省校合作基金项(2011C085)
摘 要:目的比较全视野数字乳腺X线摄影引导下导丝定位与体表定位切除不可触及乳腺病灶的准确性。资料与方法回顾性分析采用导丝定位和体表定位患者各50例,比较两组患者术前定位、手术及病理结果,分析两种定位方法的准确性。结果 50例导丝定位患者中成功定位49例,1例导丝移位未切到病灶,1例出现迷走神经反应。50例体表定位患者中病灶切除40例,10例未切到病灶,准确性为80%,无明显并发症。结论全视野数字乳腺X线摄影引导下导丝定位较体表定位准确性高,适用于不可触及乳腺病变的术前定位。Purpose To compare the accuracy of the wire guided localization under the guidance of full-field digital X-ray mammography with body surface positioning for the excision of nonpalpable breast. Materials and Methods 50 nonpalpable breast disease patients preoperative localization performed with wire guided localization and 50 patients preoperative localization performed with body surface positioning respectively were included, the preoperative localization method, surgical and pathological results were compared to analyze the accuracy of the two methods. Results Among all the patients, wire guided localization were successful in 49 cases, 1 lesion was not excised due to guidewire shifting, 1 case with vagus nerve reaction. Among the 50 patients of body surface positioning, breast lesion was removed in 40 cases, the lesion was uncut in 10 cases, with an accuracy of 80% and no significant complication occurred. Conclusion Wire guided localization under the guidance of full-field digital X-ray mammography has a higher accuracy than body surface positioning, and it is suitable for preoperative localization of the nonpalpable breast lesions.
分 类 号:R445.4[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.9[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117