检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺蓓仪[1] 田晓梅[1] 胡培安[1] 谢洁林[1] 张国福[1] 王雪珍[1] 王冬燕[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属妇产科医院放射科,上海200023
出 处:《医学影像学杂志》2013年第5期780-782,共3页Journal of Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的对比分析双能X线骨密度仪两种扫描方式的结果,评价两种扫描方式在临床的使用价值。方法对临床药理基地随访的30例受试者用两种方式进行腰椎及髋关节骨密度扫描,对比两种扫描方式的扫描时间、T值和Z值。结果两种扫描方式的扫描时间相差1倍,T值、Z值结果相同。结论在实际临床应用中采用快速扫描方式可以缩短扫描时间,减少患者受射线量,提高机器使用率。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparing and analyzing results from two different scan modes. Methods We performed bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of lumbar and hip joint using two scan modes for 30 follow-up patients in clinical pharmacological center, and compared scan time, T value and Z value under both scan modes. Results Scan time took by one scan mode was twice of the other one, no difference in T and Z value was found. Conclusion Performing fast scan mode of DXA in practical clinical application can shorten scan time, lower radiation to patient, and enhance utility efficiency of facility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173