检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省攀枝花市西区小宝鼎社区卫生服务站,四川攀枝花617013 [2]四川省攀枝花市攀煤公司总医院外科,四川攀枝花617066
出 处:《吉林医学》2013年第14期2641-2642,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨急诊胆囊切除术的临床实际治疗效果。方法:选取急诊收治的98例急性胆囊炎患者为研究对象,对患者的相关临床资料进行了回顾性分析,对实施不同胆囊切除术的临床效果进行了比较研究。结果:在腹腔引流发生和镇痛药使用方面上比较,LC组优于OC组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);LC组在胃肠功能恢复时间上低于OC组;LC组在住院时间也短于OC组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在临床上治疗急性胆囊炎的过程中,采用腹腔镜手术治疗方法的临床效果显著,是临床上的安全可靠选择。Objective To further explore the actual clinical treatment effect for emergency choleeystectomy. Methods 98 cases of pa- tients with acute eholeeystitis Emergency admitted to our hospital from December 2009 to Oetober 2012 were chosen as the research object. Acording to the elinieal data for patients, they were taken for retrospectively analyzed. The clinical effect of different choleeysteetomy ear- ried out was taken for comparative study. Results In the comparison of peritoneal drainage and the use of analgesics, the LC group was better than the OC group. The comparison between groups, P 〈 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. The LC group was lower than the OC group. The hospitalization time in the LC group was shorter than the OC group, and between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ), there was with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The clinical effect for the application of laparoscopic surgery treatment is significant in the clinieal treatment of acute cholecystitis. It is a safe and reliable ehoiee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222