检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]温州医学院附属慈溪市人民医院口眼病区,浙江慈溪315300 [2]中山大学中山眼科中心,广东广州510000
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第16期108-110,114,共4页China Modern Doctor
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81125007)
摘 要:目的探讨图文方式的临床护理干预在原发性青光眼患者中的应用效果。方法选择青光眼患者60例为研究对象,其中30例患者采用常规护理为对照组,30例患者采用图文式护理为干预组。比较两组的住院天数、相关知识的掌握情况以及生活质量情况。结果干预组的住院时间(9.1±2.5)d短于对照组(13.3±3.8)d,住院费用(4219.7±418.8)元少于对照组(4892.4±668.3)元(P均<0.05)。干预组的满意度(44.8±3.1)分及对青光眼疾病知识掌握情况(17.1±2.8)分显著优于对照组[(40.5±4.4),(13.8±2.1)]分(P均<0.05)。干预组出院时生活质量总分(117.3±31.8)分、症状与视功能评分(52.1±11.8)分、精神心理评分(20.6±7.2)分,优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将图文式临床护理路径应用于原发性青光眼的护理中,能够缩短住院天数、降低住院费用、提高患者满意度以及患者对相关知识的掌握情况,并提高患者的生活质量。Objective To discuss clinical efficacy of clinical pathway charter for primary glaucoma care. Methods Selected 60 cases with primary glaucoma were divided into two groups. Control group received normal care. Intervention group received clinical pathway charter. Length of stay, master of knowledge, quality of life were compared between two groups. Results Length of stay of intervention group (9.1±2.5)d was shorted than control group (13.3±3.8 d), hospital fee (4219.7±418.8 yuan) was less than control group (4892.4±668.3) yuan (P 〈 0.05). Satisfaction (44.8±3.1), master of knowledge (17.1±2.8) of intervention group were better than control group (40.5±4.4, 13.8±2.1) (P 〈 0.05). Quality of life (117.3±31.8), symptoms and visual function score (52.1±11.8), mental score (20.6±7.2) had significant differenee between two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Clinical pathway charter for primary glaucoma care can shorten length of stay, decrease hospital fee, improve satisfaction and knowledge mastering, and improve quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3