检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯开文[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学经济管理学院 [2]中国农业大学农业经济系
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期120-128,共9页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目<农民合作社的农业一体化研究>(审批号60773132);教育部基本科研业务费专项资金项目(科研团队培育项目)<农业经济史研究团队建设>的部分成果
摘 要:文章针对近年出现的土地聚集(农业用地规模经营和集中宅基地)现象,从理论上对其带来的问题进行了归纳,强调了政府实施新制度的高成本。然后,借助对中外历史事实的系统与深入的反思指出,不论是从博弈还是克服制度变革成本的视角,近年趋向土地聚集的创新不能算作明智之举,土地制度应该按照既有的路径稳步前进。This paper pays attention to the phenomenon of rural land ( included agricultural production land and rural resi- dence land) accumulation happened in recent years, sums up the problems induced by the behavior of land accumulation, especially the problem of very high costs for government to carry out the new institutions. Through a systematic and deep re- thinking about the historical events in China and other countries, for example, the Enclosure Movement in England during 15 - 19 Century, analyzing them from the view of Game theory, Costs of Institutional Changes, etc. , formatted the main viewpoint as that the rational institutional choice of the China' s rural land is not to accumulate it but to go forward along the former stable path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3