检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北民族学院附属医院麻醉科,湖北恩施445000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2013年第10期451-452,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的比较喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在婴儿麻醉中的效果。方法挑选在我院进行手术的婴幼儿患者74例,随机分为A和B两组,每组平均为37例。A组患儿使用喉罩麻醉法,而B组患儿则采用传统的气管插管麻醉,比较两组的麻醉效果。结果 A组患儿的麻醉效果比B组理想,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组患儿的拔管时间和清醒时间比A组要短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在婴儿的手术中采用喉罩麻醉方式能够显著提高麻醉效果,并且缩短拔管时间和清醒时间,值得临床推广和应用。Objective To compare the effect of the laryngeal mask anesthesia and tracheal intubation anesthesia in infant anesthesia. Methods 74 infant patients were randomly divided into two groups of A and B. A group used the laryngeal mask anesthesia and B group used the traditional tracheal intubation anesthesia, then to compare the effect of these two anesthesia methods. Results The anesthetic effect of A group is better than B group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Using laryngeal mask anesthesia in the operation of infants can significantly improve the anesthetic effect, is worthy of promotion and application of.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145