尿液潜血两种检验方法的比较研究  

The Comparative Study of the Two Tests in the Urine Occult Blood

作　　者：陈书跃 

机构地区：[1]湖南省益阳市安化县第二人民医院,湖南益阳413522

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2013年第10期497-498,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较尿液分析仪与显微镜检测在尿液潜血检验中的应用效果,探讨不同检验方法在尿液潜血检验中的应用价值。方法选取2010年7月至2011年7月我院门诊或住院部收集的尿液标本,分别采用尿液分析仪和显微镜进行检验,比较两种检验方法的检验结果。结果尿液分析仪检查阳性率为26.00%,显微镜检查阳性率为22.50%,两组比较具有显著性差异(P<0.05);尿液分析仪对潜血检验的敏感度为91.11%,且分析仪检查假阳性率为7.10%,假阴性率为8.89%。结论临床将尿液分析仪与显微镜检验联合应用与尿液潜血检验,可减少漏诊和误诊,提高临床检验的准确率。Objective To compare urine analyzer with microscope detected in the urine occult blood test, and explores the application value of different testing methods in urine occult blood test. Methods Urine specimens were collected from July 2010 to July 2011 in our hospital outpatient or inpatient department, Urine analyzer and microscopy were used to test respectively, and compare the test results of the two tests. Results The positive rate of Urine Analyzer checks was 26.00%, and the positive rate of microscopic examination was 22.50%, two groups with a significant difference （P〈0.05）; urine analyzer occult blood test sensitivity was 91.11%, and the false positive rate was 7.10%, false negative rate was 8.89%. Conclusion The clinical combined urine analyzer and microscope inspection in urine occult blood test, which can reduce the misdiagnosis and improve the accuracy of clinical examination.

关 键 词：尿液分析仪 显微镜检验 尿液潜血 比较分析 

分 类 号：R446.12[医药卫生—诊断学]