行政处罚能提高审计质量吗?——基于中国证监会2008-2010年行政处罚案的经验研究  

Can Disciplinary Sanctions Improve the Audit Quality:The Empirical Research Based on Penalty Cases by China Securities Regulatory Commission between 2008 and 2010?

作　　者：刘笑霞[1] 李明辉[2] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学商学院,江苏南京211100 [2]南京大学商学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《证券市场导报》2013年第6期27-32,42,共7页Securities Market Herald

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<我国审计师法律惩戒后果的实证研究--以行政处罚为重点>(11YJC790124);国家自然科学基金面上项目<中国会计师事务所合并的经济后果研究>(71072043);<外部审计对上市公司投融资行为的影响>(71272099);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目<独立审计质量的影响因素:分析框架与经验证据>(2010ZDIXM025)

摘　　要：本文以2008～2010年间中国证监会针对会计师事务所的处罚案为对象，以操控性应计的绝对值作为审计质量的替代变量，采用配对的方法，考察行政处罚对审计质量的影响。研究结果发现，在受到处罚后，受罚事务所客户的操控性应计的绝对值会显著下降，且显著低于未受罚事务所的客户，表明行政处罚有助于促使相关事务所提高审计质量，因而是有效的；在处罚前年份，对受罚事务所的客户而言，其操控性应计的绝对值显著高于配对样本，表明受处罚的事务所的审计质量确实较低，因此，证监会的处罚制度是适当的。研究还发现，上市公司所在地区的法治环境并不会影响行政处罚的有效性。We use discretionary accruals to surrogate audit quality and investigate the effect of auditor sanctions on audit quality by examining the data of listed clients of accounting firms sanctioned by CSRC in 2008-2010 and their matching companies. The result shows that the sanctioned accounting firms would decrease their clients＇ discretionary accruals （thus increase audit quality） significantly after the sanctions, and, in the years after sanctions, the audit quality of sanctioned firms is significantly higher than unsanctioned firms. Such result demonstrates the effectiveness of sanction system of CSRC. In addition, in the years before sanctions, the audit quality of sanctioned accounting firms is significantly lower than their unsanctioned counterparts. The evidence to some extent supports the appropriateness of the sanction system of CSRC. But the legal environment of clients has little effect on the effectiveness of auditor sanction system.

关 键 词：法律责任 行政处罚 操控性应计 审计质量 

分 类 号：F239[经济管理—会计学]