检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李宏[1]
出 处:《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第2期46-52,共7页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(12BFX075)
摘 要:遗嘱继承制度隐含着四个价值悖论:遗嘱自由与公平的悖论;遗嘱自由与效率的悖论;遗嘱自由与秩序的悖论;遗嘱公平与效率的悖论。实现遗嘱继承价值间的平衡,从悖论的境况中解脱出来,是近现代世界各国遗嘱法的理性选择。我国《继承法》也应顺应世界遗嘱法的发展趋势,结合我国继承文化的实际,对遗嘱自由重新进行合理的定位,即将遗嘱自由限定在一定的范围内,构建遗嘱自由、公平、效率、秩序价值间的平衡机制。Testamentary succession contains four major value paradoxes:paradox of freedom of testament and fairness,paradox of freedom of testament and efficiency,paradox of freedom of testament and order,and paradox of fairness of testament and efficiency.It has become a rational choice for the modern world to balance the value of testamentary succession and get free from such paradoxes.To comply with this trend,inheritance law in our country should be re-positioned,taking the reality of our country into consideration.Freedom of testament should be limited to a certain degree to construct a mechanism which is balanced in freedom,fairness,efficiency,and order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249