检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省广元市第二人民医院疼痛科,628017
出 处:《实用疼痛学杂志》2013年第1期47-48,共2页Pain Clinic Journal
摘 要:目的比较痛点注射联合口服药物与单纯口服药物治疗门诊常见疼痛性疾病的疗效。方法痛点注射联合口服治疗组(联合组)764例,单纯口服药物治疗组(对照组)928例。随访1年观察其效果。结果联合组的VAS、关节触痛、WOM—AC骨关节炎指数均较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P〈o.05);联合组无效率及复发率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组患者不良反应差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论对门诊常见疼痛性疾病痛点注射联合口服药物的疗效显著优于单纯口服药物治疗,且不增加药物不良反应。Objective To compare the effects of trigger point injection combined with oral drugs and oral drugs alone in the treatment of pain diseases. Methods Seven hundred and sixty-four patients in the treatment group (combination group) were treated by trigger point injection combined with oral drugs, and 928 patients (as control group) were by oral drugs alone. Therapeutic effects were observed at 1 year following up. Results VAS, articular tenderness and WOM-AC arthritis index were significantly lower in the combination group than those in the control group(P〈0.05). The ineffective and recurrent rates were significantly lower at one year after the treatment in the com- bination group than those in the control group(P〈0.05). No difference was found in adverse reac- tions between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of trigger points injection com- bined with oral drugs is superior to oral medication alone in the treatment of pain diseases without in- creasing adverse reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.123