法国调节学派的学派定位及其理论创新研究  

School Positioning and Theoretical Innovations of French Regulation School

作　　者：吕守军[1] 严成男 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030 [2]新泻大学经济学部,日本新泻市9502181

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第3期33-40,共8页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"国外马克思主义经济理论前沿研究"(10CJL001);上海市教委科研创新项目"法国调节学派最新发展研究"(12ZS019)

摘　　要：论文把法国调节学派置于整个经济学系谱中对其流派定位进行了考察,认为该学派具有与新古典经济学派相对立,属于马克思主义经济学派但又与以《帝国主义论》为代表的马克思主义经济学相区别的特征;其次,对法国调节学派和法国调节学派创立之前作为马克思主义经济学最高学术成果之一的宇野理论进行了对比,认为法国调节学派解决了宇野理论中"原理论"的"19世纪特权化"问题、"阶段论"和"现状分析"的历史阶段设定问题以及"现状分析"的理论空洞化问题;最后,对法国调节学派的理论创新内容进行了归纳,认为该学派在理论体系上与马克思的理论和观点保持了高度一致,在研究方法上拒绝了"大而空"的理论。This paper, places French Regulation School in the entire economics pedigree to examine its genre positioning. It draws the conclusion that French Regulation School is opposed to the neoclassical school of economics, and belongs to Marxist school. However, it is different from the Marxist economics represented by the ＂imperialism theory＂. Secondly, it makes a comparison of the French Regulation School with the Uno Theory, which is one of the highest academic achievements of Marxist economics in the 1960s and-1970s, before the French Regulation School was formed. It draws the conclusion that the French Regulation School have solved some problems in the Uno Theory such as the problem of ＂the 19th century Privileging＂, and the problem of historical stage setting in the ＂stage theory＂ and ＂current situation analysis＂, and the problem of the theoretical hollowing in ＂current situation analysis＂. Finally, it summaries the theoretical innovation of French Regulation School. It maintains that this school is highly consistent with the Marxist theory in the theoretical system and that it refuses the ＂big and empty＂ theory in research. This paper is of important reference for current Marxist economics innovation.

关 键 词：法国调节学派 学派定位 理论创新 

分 类 号：F095.65[经济管理—政治经济学]