检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗万里[1]
出 处:《学术界》2013年第5期120-127,284-285,共8页Academics
摘 要:行政道歉只在我国极少数行政行为侵权法律中出现。但是,近年来全国各地兴起的行政道歉却处于自发与非法律化的状态。行政道歉是人民主权原则的彰显,是塑造行政合法性的重要途径。行政道歉法律化有广泛的现实诉求和深刻的理论逻辑:在法律性、公共性与道德性之间寻找行政道歉法律化的限度;基于我国法制特点在立法体例、责任追究机制等方面探索行政道歉法律化的路径。建立全国层面的行政道歉制度,必须将行政道歉逐步纳入法治的轨道。Administrative apology appears in few laws and regulations of administrative behavior infringement. But,administrative apologies arising around the country in recent years are in the spontaneous and non - legalized state. Administrative apology highlighting the principle of the sovereignty of the people is an important way to establish administrative legitimacy. The legalization of adminis-trative apology has extensive practical demands and profound theoretical logic,including searching for the limitation of legalization of administrative apology among legality,publicness and morality and exploring the path of legalization of administrative apology in legislative style and accountability mechanisms etc. based on the characteristics of China’s legal system. In order to establish administrative apologize system in national level,administrative apology must be brought in the orbit of the rule of law progressively.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15