检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳市东陵区东陵卫生院,沈阳110172 [2]辽宁中医药大学研究生学院
出 处:《中国中医骨伤科杂志》2013年第6期39-41,共3页Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
摘 要:目的:探讨治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效可靠且安全的治疗方法。方法:选择1996年6月-2011年6月收治的椎动脉型颈椎病患者,分为手法治疗组、药物治疗组和综合治疗组,进行临床分析。结果:手法治疗组临床治愈率及总有效率分别为57.32%和85.37%,药物治疗组分别为62.50%和84.38%,综合治疗组分别为84.52%和95.24%.经Ridit分析,3组疗效比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合治疗组疗效明显优于手法治疗组和药物治疗组。结论:综合治疗组治疗椎动脉型颈椎病可获得满意疗效,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To detect an effective and safe method in the treatment of vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis. Methods:The vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis patients which were treated from 1996 to 2011 were divided into manipulative treatment group, medicine treatment group, and combined therapy group. There were no significant differ- ences in general data (P〉0.05). Results:The clinical cure rate and the total effective rate were 57.32% and 85.37% re- spectively in the manipulative treatment group, 62.50% and 84.38% respectively in the medicine treatment group, and 84. 52% and 95.24% respectively in the combined therapy group. By Ridit analysis, the curative effect were significant differ- ent in above three groups (P〈0.05). The effectiveness of combined therapy group was superiority to the treatment group. Conclusion : The curative effect of combined therapy is significantly superiority to manipulative treatment and medicine treat- ment, and it is worth for clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145