检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈旻
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2013年第6期476-477,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的比较五腧穴(荥、输穴)透刺治疗躯体疼痛型亚健康患者与药物治疗的疗效差异。方法将50例躯体疼痛型亚健康患者随机分为治疗组26例、对照组24例。治疗组采用五腧穴(荥、输穴)透刺,对照组采用生脉注射液静脉滴注治疗,比较两组治疗后临床症状改善情况,评定两组的疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为96.2%,对照组为83.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论五腧穴透刺治疗躯体疼痛型亚健康患者总有效率优于药物治疗。Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between point-through-point acupuncture at Five-shu points (Ying-spring points and Shu-stream points) and medication in treating pain-dominant sub-health. Method Fifty patients with pain-dominant sub-health were randomized into a treatment group of 26 cases and a control group of 24 cases. The treatment group was intervened by point-through-point acupuncture at Five-shu points (Ying-spring and Shu-stream points), and the control group was by intravenous injection of Sheng Mai injection. Improvements of clinical symptoms after treatment and therapeutic effects were compared and evaluated in the two groups. Result The total effective rate was 96.2% in the treatment group versus 83.3% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05), Conclusion Point-through-point acupuncture at Five-shu points has higher therapeutic effect than medication in treating pain-dominant sub-health.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15