一般侵权冲突法的正义取向与我国司法解释的制订  

On the Trend of Justice in Conflicts Law on General Tort and the Formulation of China's Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：许庆坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2013年第3期128-139,179-180,共12页The Jurist

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"我国涉外民事关系法律适用法司法难点研究"(项目编号:12BFX138)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：欧美现代一般侵权冲突法复杂精细,其背后不仅蕴含着对冲突法正义的追求,而且纳入了对实体法正义的关切。我国最新立法未全面体现实体法正义,而且与冲突法正义亦有距离。最高人民法院应通过科学精细的司法解释,吸收欧美最新立法和理论成果,区分行为标准和损害赔偿的不同争点,明确侵权行为地的具体含义,灵活解释当事人意思自治原则,适当释放最密切联系原则的作用空间,藉此将我国立法推至世界先进之列。The modern conflicts law on general tort has grown delicate and complicated in Europe and America, the spirit of which combines the pursuit of conflicts justice and the concern with substantive justice.China's latest legislation not only failed to comprehensively reflect the pursuit of substantive justice,but also did not reach the standard of conflicts justice.By scientific and precise judicial interpretation,the Supreme People's Court of China should draw from the latest European and American codifications and academic achievements,distinguish between conduct-standard issue and loss-distribution issue,clarify the concept of loci delicti,flexibly interpret the principle of party autonomy and properly leave some room for the principle of the closest connection.By such subsequent improvements,the China's legislation might become one of the first-class codifications in the world.

关 键 词：一般侵权冲突法 冲突法正义 实体法正义 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]