“微气流法”与“强远震法”“动壳体法”标定水平摆格值结果的对比分析  

COMPARISON OF CALIBRATED RESULTS OF HORIZONTAL PENDULUM SCALE AMONG METHODS OF "MICRO-AIRFLOW" "STRONG DISTANT EARTHQUAKE" AND "MOVING CASE"

作　　者：陈德福[1] 余加虹 潘月珍 陆南栋 

机构地区：[1]国家地震局地震研究所 [2]浙江湖州地震台 [3]浙江地震局

出　　处：《地壳形变与地震》1991年第3期55-62,共8页Crustal Deformation and Earthquake

摘　　要：本文简述了“微气流法”(含简易装置介绍)、“强远震法”、“动壳体法”三种标定水平摆倾斜仪格值的具体方法。对比分析了它们的实验数据后认为:为保证水平摆观测资料的质量,在暂无条件使用“胀盒阶跃法”标定的台站应采用“微气流法”标定水平摆格值。Three methods for scale calibration of horizontal pendulum tiltmeter, 'microairflow', 'strong distant earthquake' and 'moving case', are briefly introduced. Comparing and analysing their test data, it is shown that in order to ensure quality of record data, the horizontal pendulum scale should be calibrated by the 'microairflow' method when station have lack of condition of the 'crapandine jump' calibration method.

关 键 词：地壳 形变 观测结果 对比分析 

分 类 号：P315.63[天文地球—地震学]