非强制引航合同性质之法律分析  

Legal Analysis on the Nature of Non-Compulsory Pilotage Agreement

作　　者：郭萍[1] 朱珂 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026 [2]中国人保财险股份有限公司大连分公司,辽宁大连116001

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第6期53-58,共6页Law Science Magazine

基　　金："辽宁省高校创新团队支持计划"资助(WT2012002);教育部重大攻关项目"保障我国海上通道安全研究"(11JZD049);辽宁省社科基金重点项目"经济发展中辽宁海域环境保护的现状及法律思考"(L11AFX002)

摘　　要：作为国际惯例,强制引航的情况下,引航员疏忽导致水上事故损失均由被引领船舶的船东负责。而国际上一些国家对非强制引航作区别于强制引航的法律后果。我国目前尚无明确法律规定。非强制引航协议具有委托合同的属性,非强制引航员过失造成被引领船舶损失的,应当承担违约赔偿责任。Being the international practice, the civil liability arising from accidents which were caused by the fault of compulsory pilot is borne by the owner of the ship being piloted. How-ever, the legal status of non - compulsory pilotage service differs from compulsory pilotage service in some other countries. There is no clear provision on this point in China. This paper defines the exact meaning of non - compulsory pilotage service on the comparison of Chinese law and laws of other countries, and further points out the nature of non - compulsory pilotage agreement is one of entrustment contract, thereby the liabilities for breach such contract shall be borne by pilot insti-tution for the loss of vessel suffered from the negligence of non - compulsory pilot.

关 键 词：引航协议 非强制引航 合同性质 违约责任 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学] D922.294[政治法律—法学]