检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023 [2]江苏省常州市高新区人民检察院,江苏常州213022
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2013年第3期89-100,共12页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:2009年度国家社科基金项目"宽严相济刑事政策实施机制研究"(09CFX057)
摘 要:罪刑法定原则必须与时俱进,刑法规范内容的多样化必然带来罪刑法定原则内容的多样化,但罪刑法定原则长期被学界定位为犯罪与刑罚的法定化,无法充分体现其限制刑罚权滥用的制度价值。随着刑事司法中的最大问题由罪刑擅断到量刑不公的转变,罪刑法定原则的内涵亦应该有所拓展,即从"犯罪与刑罚之法定化"的二元格局迈向"犯罪、刑罚与量刑之法定化"的三元格局。其中,评价范围与评价方法的法定化,就是量刑法定化的题中之义。The principle of legality shall advance with the times, the diversitication ot the contents ot crim- inal law will inevitably lead to the diversification of the principle of legality. However, for a long time the prin- ciple of legality is defined as the 1 embody egalization of crime and penalty in the legal community, thus it cannot fully its system value of imposing restriction on abusing power of punishment. The most serious problem in crime and penalty" shall be transformed into the ternary pattern of "legalization of crime, penalty and senten- cing". Therefore, the legalization of scope and measures of evaluation is the key issue in legally prescribed punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249