小儿呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎中西医对照治疗成本-效果分析  被引量:3

Multi-Attribute Evaluation on Clinical Effect Differences between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Used in Treatment of Children RSV Pneumonia

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:胥会英[1] 韩新民[2] 黄建萍[1] 

机构地区:[1]无锡市第三人民医院儿科,江苏无锡214041 [2]南京中医药大学儿科教研室,江苏南京210046

出  处:《辽宁中医杂志》2013年第6期1188-1189,共2页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘  要:目的:评价小儿呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎中西医对照治疗的临床疗效和成本-效果比。方法:按中药和西药治疗方法将216例痰热闭肺证型患者分为中药组和西药组,运用药物经济学的成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果:中药和西药组的愈显率分别为87.83%和79.21%,两组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),但直接治疗成本有统计学意义(P<0.05),中药组优于西药组。结论:中药与西药治疗小儿呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎疗效相同,但中药治疗有成本优势。Objective:This study is conducted to compare the cost -effect ratio between the traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of pediatric respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia. Methods :216 of phlegm-heat blocking lung syndrome were allocated to the traditional Chinese medicine treatment ( study group) and western medicine treatment ( control group). The two treatments were compared by cost-effect of ratio. Results : Comparison of efficacy between groups : the efficacy respectively was 87. 83 % and 79.21% in the study and control groups, there was no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). But the direct treatment costs had significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ), traditional Chinese medicine group was superior to control group. Conclusion : The two groups have the same efficacy in treating phlegm - heat blocking lung syndrome of RSV pneumonia, but the treatment with traditional Chinese medicine regimen has a cost advantage.

关 键 词:呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎 中西医对照治疗 成本一效果比 直接治疗成本 

分 类 号:R563.1[医药卫生—呼吸系统]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象