美国工业事故法的转型探析  

Transitions of the American Laws for Industrial Accidents in Twentieth Century

作　　者：张晓明[1] 李云求 

机构地区：[1]九江学院,江西九江332005 [2]团山镇联校,湖南邵东422817

出　　处：《广东广播电视大学学报》2013年第3期23-27,51,共6页Journal of Guangdong Radio & Television University

基　　金：国家社科基金<公平正义社会秩序的的维护>(07BFX009);教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目<国家义务视角下劳动权立法保障的借鉴与完善研究>(12YJC820141)

摘　　要：侵权法的缺陷促使美国寻找解决工业事故的替代路径。劳工赔偿体制只是替代路径的一种。美国的劳工赔偿立法主要表现为各州的立法,因法院的合宪性审查而经历了一个曲折的发展历程。劳工赔偿立法将驱动雇主去履行注意义务,尽可能地减少事故的发生。美国虽对欧洲国家的工业事故处理机制进行模仿和借鉴,但美国最终确定了处理工业事故问题的独特模式。Defects of tort law urged the United States to find alternative ways to solve the industrial accident. The laborer compensation system is an alternative. The compensation acts which had gone through a tortuous development course due to judicial review of the courts were mainly legislations in the State. The workmen＇s compensation acts drove employers to perform the duty of care to reduce the incidence of accidents as much as possible. The United States finalized the unique pattern of dealing with industrial accidents through drawing the experience of the mechanisms in European countries.

关 键 词：工业事故 侵权法 劳工赔偿法 转型 

分 类 号：DF47[政治法律—民商法学]