民事优先权的物权性与物权公示主义的矛盾及解决  

Conflicts between the Real Right Nature of Civil Priority and the Publicity of Real Right and Solutions

作　　者：蔡远涛[1] 叶知年[1] 

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期39-42,共4页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：福州大学srtp计划专项项目基金资助

摘　　要：在债权债务关系中,如何使各种债权公平获得清偿一直是人们关注的焦点。优先权制度就是人们在经济社会生活实践中,通过法律手段解决这一问题的创造。我国法律对优先权制度的规定还很不完善,且对其性质还存在诸多争议,因此人民法院的民商审判中对于优先权制度的理解与适用往往引起争论,也引起了不少人士的关注。由于物权实行物权法定主义,优先权在法律规范中实际上处于无名无实的地位,这种情形不利于维护正常的经济秩序和社会稳定。从优先权即先取特权的性质特征出发,综合担保物权制度的有关规定和学说,力图澄清优先权的性质,并对我国法律中优先权制度的建立谈一点粗浅的看法。How to make all the obligatory rights impartially paid off is always people＇s concern among the relationship of obligatory rights and debts. Priority system is a creation for settling this issue by means of law in the practice of economic social life. But the relevant provisions about priority system in Chinese laws are imperfect, and there also exist lots of controversies about its na- ture. Therefore, the understanding and application of priority during civil and commercial trials made by the people＇s courts usu- ally lead to controversies, which also draw the attention of a number of people. Due to the numerous clauses of real right, priority has no real status in the legal norms, and this situation does not help to maintain normal social order and economic order. Begin- ning with the nature that a priority is just a privilege to prior get a property, relevant provisions and theories concerning the sys- tem of real right of security are integrated, the nature of priority is clarified and the establishment of priority system in Chinese laws is discussed.

关 键 词：优先权 物权公示性 矛盾 补救 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]