我国城市慈善事业发展状况的聚类分析——以沿海地区15市为例  

Cluster analysis for charity development of cities in China:taking 15 coastal cities as the example

作　　者：杨旋[1] 唐果[1] 贺翔[2] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学科学技术学院,浙江宁波315211 [2]宁波大学商学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《科技与管理》2013年第3期1-4,共4页Science-Technology and Management

基　　金：2010年国家社会科学基金项目(10BJY105);2012年度浙江省民政政策理论研究课题(12MZLT084TJ)

摘　　要：课题组运用聚类分析法从捐赠总额、志愿参与率、万人拥有慈善组织数、受益规模等4个方面对沿海地区15市的慈善发展状况进行研究。研究结果表明,上述15个城市的慈善事业发展状况可以归为4类。第1类是慈善事业发展状况最好的城市,包括上海和深圳;第2类是慈善事业发展状况较差的城市,包括石家庄、唐山、秦皇岛、常州;第3类是慈善事业发展状况一般的城市,包括沈阳、南京、无锡、昆山、宁波、绍兴、厦门;第4类是慈善事业发展状况较好的城市,包括大连和广州。为了提升城市慈善事业发展水平,属于第2类和第3类的9个城市要以上海、深圳、大连、广州为榜样,积极学习好的做法,并根据自身情况进行创新。The research group studies the development of charity in 15 Chinese coastal cities by using cluster analy- sis from aspects of donation amount, voluntary participation, charitable organizations number and benefit condition. The results show that charity development condition of the 15 cities of can be classified into four categories. Class 1 is cities with best charity development status, including Shanghai and Shenzhen; the second kind is cities with poor charity development, including Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Changzhou ; the third class is cities with or- dinary charity status, including Shenyang, Nanjing and Wuxi, Kunshan, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Xiamen; category 4 is cities with good charity development condition, including Dalian and Guangzhou. In order to upgrade city charity development level, the 9 cities which belong to the category 2 and 3 should actively learn from shanghai, Shenz- hen, Dalian, and Guangzhou, and should innovate according to situation of themselves.

关 键 词：沿海地区 城市 慈善事业 捐赠 聚类分析 

分 类 号：D632.1[政治法律—政治学]