检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《成都体育学院学报》2013年第6期66-69,共4页Journal of Chengdu Sport University
基 金:国家社科基金项目:规划视域中的竞技体育伦理体系构建研究
摘 要:运用文献资料法,结合一些实际比赛案例,对运动竞赛规则基本理论进行重新审视,剖析运动竞赛规则合理性的评价向度,认为:运动竞赛规则应该从价值合理性、工具合理性和形式合理性几个向度进行评价。当三者不一致甚至发生冲突时,价值合理性应是运动员比赛或裁判员判罚的首要依据。运动员对规则漏洞的利用,尽管没有违背比赛的显规则、正式规则,但充分利用了运动竞赛的潜规则,违背了人们已经达成共识的非正式规则,损害了体育运动精神,破坏了竞技运动应有的教育价值和示范效应。The basic theories and the evaluation dimension of the rationality of sports competition rules are analyzed in the paper by reviewing literature and combining some practical competition examples. It is believed that sports competition rules should be analyzed from the dimensions of rationality for value, tool and form. Value rationality should be the first criterion for players'competition and referees'judgment when contradictions are witnessed among them. The use of rule loopholes on the part of athletes does not violate the public and formal rules, but it takes advantage of the hidden rules in sports competition, which violates the commonly agreed rules, damages sportsmanship and ruins the educational value and demonstration effects of competitive sports.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117