检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王振清[1] 周春雷[1] 丁永刚[1] 尚豫才[1]
机构地区:[1]河南工业大学土木建筑学院,河南郑州450001
出 处:《河南工业大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第3期90-93,共4页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Natural Science Edition
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD03B00)
摘 要:以一种大直径圆筒形地下粮仓工程为背景,根据当地地质条件,对目前的抗浮下拉法、配重法、抗浮梁压顶法等抗浮措施进行了比较分析.研究发现:抗浮下拉法、配重法等不利于建筑构造的防水、施工等,影响结构安全;抗浮梁压顶法有利于工程的防水处理,是一种比较理想的抗浮措施.结合相关规范,给出了抗浮梁压顶法的设计方法.结果表明,该方法能较好地解决地下粮仓的抗浮问题.Based on large-diameter cylindrical underground granary project, we compared and analyzed the existing anti-floating pull down method, balanced weight method, and anti-floating beam press roof method, according to the local geological conditions. The results showed that the anti-floating pull down method, the balanced weight method and the like could influence the structural safety due to the bad impacts on the building waterproof processing, construction and the like. The anti-floating beam press roof method was good to project waterproof processing, and was the ideal anti-floating measure. With reference to related standards, we put forward the design method of the anti-floating beam press roof method. The calculation result showed that the method could well solve the anti-floating problem of the underground granary.
分 类 号:TS210[轻工技术与工程—粮食、油脂及植物蛋白工程] TU93[轻工技术与工程—食品科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28