论南京“审判战犯军事法庭”对南京大屠杀案的审判  

On the Trial of Nanjing Massacre Conducted by Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal

作　　者：经盛鸿[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学历史系

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2013年第6期142-151,共10页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

摘　　要：抗日战争胜利以后,东京"远东国际军事法庭"与南京"审判战犯军事法庭"都对侵华日军南京大屠杀的罪行进行了严肃的审理与庄严的判决。但是过去史学界对东京"远东国际军事法庭"的研究较多,而对南京"审判战犯军事法庭"的研究不够,甚至重视不够。本文对南京"审判战犯军事法庭"设立的历史背景、审理南京大屠杀案的过程、特点及其重要意义作一阐述,指出南京"审判战犯军事法庭"审理南京大屠杀案,具有合法性、严密性、典型性与宽严结合的政策性等特点,其所确认的"日军南京大屠杀杀害中国战俘与平民三十万人以上",具有不容置疑的历史权威性。南京"审判战犯军事法庭"对南京大屠杀案的审判有着"远东国际军事法庭"所不能替代的特殊重要意义。The International Military Tribunal for the Far East and the Nanjing War Crimes Tri- bunal all conducted the trial of Nanjing Massacre after the victory of the World Anti-Japanese War. Historians used to pay less attention to the Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal than the International Mili- tary Tribunal for the Far East. The article elaborates on the background of the establishment of the Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal, the process and features of the trial of the Nanjing Massacre and its significance. It points out that the Nanjing Massacre trial from the Nanjing Military Tribunals is legit- imate, rigorous, typical and combined both tight and loose policy together. The fact confirmed by Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal that more than 300,000 Chinese prisoners of war and civilians were killed by Japanese invaders is historically undisputed and the significance of Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal can not be replaced by International Military Tribunal for the Far East.

关 键 词：南京大屠杀 南京“审判战犯军事法庭” 合法性 严密性 权威性 

分 类 号：K265[历史地理—历史学]